"I"/George's Insights 

12/01/09

An Interview With “I”

Editor’s Note #1

“I” – no surprise – interviewed himself for this piece.  He had requested of himself some further insights into his approach to G&S, and the creation of Gee ‘n Ess &“I” – and, he kindly obliged himself.  He-the-interviewer and He-the-interviewee by all accounts got on famously! 
                                                                                                               
                                                                                                               - the ed. ("I")

Editor’s Note #2

Willian Schwenck Gilbert – the librettist (he wrote the words) of the G&S collaboration – was born in 1836, one hundred years before “I”/George’s 1936 arrival.  So, “I” & “I” kicked off their interview:

Q.   -  So, you think the 100-year birth date coincidence is – maybe – “fun”? 
        
“I”   - Kind of seems significant, huh?  “Bound-to-be,” this affinity I have for W.S.   Gilbert and his genius?…this attraction I have to him?…but, I’m not really superstitious at all.

Q.   - Are you a true exponent of “traditional” G&S? – you know, the “don’t change a thing from the original” kind of tradition?

“I”  - Well, you bring up a good point; there’s been a fun sort of evolution there. Until 1961 – 50 years following Gilbert’s death at the expiry of the copyrights to his work – every performance of G&S had to be done exactly as in Gilbert’s original stage direction – no changes permitted.  And, worldwide, it had become a sort of “in’ joke - one G&S-er to another (they’re called “Savoyards,” after the Savoy Opera house built for G&S to perform their comic operas) – when one would inquire about the upcoming production by another:  [mock-conspiratorial, hushed tone] – “you’re not going to change anything, I trust!?” – [with pseudo-gravity]…because performers everywhere just love to depart from the original, and launch into something they think is brilliant and comical to add to the show; so – usually for the better – it was frowned upon to even sneak in any unapproved “comic” bits into G&S.  But then, after 1961, the world went wild – all sorts of crazy variations of the shows were staged (some of them fun, some disastrous) – all sorts of experiments and games played with G&S.

     But I (“I”) am more traditional than not; no “witty” changes of words, or new verses to songs; no (I hope) excessive hamming it up.  Rather, there’s much attempt by me and the designers to milk the original intent to the max extent of which I’m capable – given my understanding of the wit and the drama, and with whatever abilities I do (or don’t) have, to play it, say it, sing it, dance it, costume it – all of that.

There’s an old adage – or, if there isn’t, there should be, ‘cause it’s true:  you can’t spoof a spoof!!

Q.  -  A spoof?

“I” -  A send-up…a guy

Q.  -  A what?

“I” -  A parody… a take-off.  I try to avoid camp.

Q. -  Avoid what

“I” -  Overplaying…sort-of  “making fun of.”  So, I try to do the best I can to make what Gilbert & Sullivan created come alive in a meaningful way for today’s audience – both adults and kids.  What I mean is, if the original wit or humor is really good – even if dated (old-time issues) – then, making fun of the making fun is invariably disastrous – a real bomb! – and not even necessary – it stands on its own!  (If I could write like Gilbert did 125 years ago, then I’d be writing original stuff!  I can’t, and so I’m not!)

Q. -  So, what do you bring to G&S in Gee ‘n Ess & “I” that 1000s of prior productions haven’t?

“I” -  Scary question!!  No, not really:  I think and hope that I bring perspective, first and foremost…the sum total of the approach; the synthesis of all the bits we’ve created from eleven of the shows – I think – is unique.  There’s not one single – that is, by-itself – thing, song, dance – that I do in this show which hasn’t been performed “better” by literally hundreds of professional and amateur performers – both men and women – in the past 100 years.  But what I really believe, is that the amalgam – the interrelationships, the interweaving of the various bits we’ve created – is  unique, and – to me – interesting.  I have fun playing it – experiencing the progression.  Whether people will like it?...you know, I think that many will; if not?...well, anyway, it’s been a joy, for three years, to create it.

Q. -  So, you play G&S sort of “straight”?

“I” -  Well, yes and no.  We’re taking advantage of as many opportunities as possible to utilize – capitalize on – the unique features our show offers:  the “one-man-doing-it-all” pre-recording, singing choruses and harmony, and solos of men and women; my own added text (sparing enough, I hope) to link the “bits” and provide a little context for them; the “color” potential of our computer-generated sound for the accompaniment; the all-sorts-of visual projections on-stage – the creative paintings, the video.  So…no, I’d have to say that it’s very unconventional…but, in a traditional sort of way…

Q. -  Meaning?

“I” -  Guess you’ll just have to come and see! 

“O, winnow all my folly, folly, folly, and you’ll find

      A grain or two of Truth among the chaff!”

                                                                  -  Jack Point (the Jester) – “Yeomen Of Guard”

“Mad? … I?

      Yes!  Very!

   But…why?

      Mys –TER-ry!”             -  Mad Margaret - "Ruddigore"


Madness?  Who knows?  Folly?   Truth?   Chaff?


At 73 - working daily - to “try” to sing, dance, act, etc. -   


(battling the weight problem - avoiding looking foolish or worse?) 

Foot, toe, knee, neck, back - whatever; they alternate defying the continuing!  

        (Can you relate?)

 Heart?  (the beating one) That’s fine - amazing 11 years post-quad/bypass!

          ...(the “faint-of” kind?):  - well, that’s different!  Wondering, “Why do it?!”- (who knows?)    Enduring intruding flashes/fantasies, of  friends rolling eyes, exchanging glances:  “Ohhhooo…is he bad, or what?!”  (& Non-friends:  “We paid money for this guy?!)

So, again, why?

Because it’s there?!  Maybe:  hope springs eternal – “it will be good!” 

      …because, to say, “I did it?!”

          Maybe…maybe that’s part of it?

I don’t know for sure. 

I DO Know ONE thing for sure:

G&S are witty, funny, articulate, lively, musical, interpretive of the passing scene, literate, easy, yet intellectually stimulating - all at the same time!  


There’s a collective “we got it?” awareness that all who experience them share; yet G&S are fodder for private ruminations* also - and I want us (the oldsters, who’ve been there before) and our kids – to experience it! - to get it! -  to ruminate on it!

 

G&S – (especially the way we’re approaching presenting them on-stage in Gee ‘n Ess & “I”) - certainly do open intellectual and fun-ness doors that may not be beckoning to our kids in our current culture!


And I think I can pull it off;

        and, if I don’t, what’s the worst that can happen? 

             No big deal.  Just one more old guy looking foolish…

              But to not try - now that would be a big deal!


See you,

“I”

*Sorry [fodder…ruminate]; couldn’t help it; it just came to me!